The role of ETH in the Gotthard Base Tunnel

Tunnelling through "flowing ground"

The engineers were forced to address this key question during the early planning stage in the Piora syncline on the southern side of the Gotthard. Due to its geological nature, this fault zone had been dreaded by experts for years: no one was sure whether the sugary dolomite on the mountain¡¯s surface extended all the way down to tunnel level. If so, the tunnel would have had to break through 30 to 50 metres of "flowing ground"; i.e. loose soil under high water pressure. This risk prompted the ETH scientists to perform extensive tunnel static calculations. ¡°The tests showed the importance of aspects such as tunnel support, compressive strength and the thickness of the injection body to overcome flowing ground,¡± explains Anagnostou.

At the Tavetsch intermediate massif in the north-east, the ETH scientists analysed the deformability of the rock and provided the scientific basis to help prevent construction delays. ¡°Squeezing rock conditions can jam the tunnel-boring machines, leading to major construction delays,¡± explains Anagnostou. It goes without saying that such delays are very expensive. In this respect, the findings from the Gotthard Base Tunnel ¨C the world¡¯s longest railway tunnel ¨C are also of great economic importance for international tunnel construction.

Gotthard as a driver of research

¡°The work on the Gotthard has provided all kinds of extremely important impetus for research, the results of which are not just applicable here in Switzerland but also in other countries around the world, such as in projects in Turkey and the US.¡± However, the findings from this unique project also have more far-reaching implications: they are covered in dissertations and taught on courses that educate the tunnel engineers of the future.

Precise to 0.001 degrees

Researchers at the Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry also made considerable contributions to the successful construction of the Gotthard. The tunnel surveying specialists provided the scientific basis for the planning and engineering of the Alpine tunnel. Although the difficult conditions on the Gotthard massif posed major challenges for the surveyors, these were overcome with the help of professors Alessandro Carosio, who served as a geodesy expert at AlpTransit Gotthard AG until his retirement in 2008, and Alain Geiger.

The geomatics engineers used GPS for orientation of the structure on the surface; however, the signals cannot be received inside the mountain. The course was therefore determined using a gyrotheodolite that can measure the direction of geodetic north to an accuracy of 0.001 degrees, exact enough for boring long tunnels. To achieve this level of precision ¨C and to link the portals at exactly the right height ¨C the effects of gravitational anomalies and deflections of the vertical on the measurements had to be corrected.

At the tunnel site, these were caused mainly by the topography and the differing rock density inside the mountain. The required model (geoid) of the gravity field could be determined only with the help of the expertise and specifically designed measurement devices at ETH Zurich.

An engineering masterstroke

The researchers also played a pioneering role in the methodology. At Sedrun, inertial measurement technology was used for the first time to determine the direction inside the tunnel, along with the gyrotheodolite. ETH professor Hilmar Ingensand developed this technology together with his colleagues at TU Munich. With the additional measurement data, the surveyors were able to ensure that boring progressed in the right direction from its origin at the base of the 800 metre shaft. These research efforts paid off: at the final breakthrough of the tunnel, the deviation was a mere eight centimetres horizontally and one centimetre vertically ¨C an engineering masterstroke. And as noted by Carosio: ¡°The surveyors responsible were all ETH graduates.¡±